Hard healing work in Rwanda, a promising country with deep enduring scars

 

As a Rwandan proverb laments, ‘Help from abroad always comes when the rain has stopped’

October 26, 2024

On April 7, 2024, Rwandan President Paul Kagame lit the flame of this Eternal Flame Monument now installed at the Kigali Genocide Memorial as a 30-year remembrance of the genocide initiated that day in 1994. (Contributed photo)

The Republic of Rwanda, a small country in central Africa the size of Maryland, is commemorating the 30th year since the genocide tore the nation apart. In a 100-day period between April 7 and July 19, 1994, up to 800,000 Tutsis were slaughtered by Hutu militias, and an estimated 500,000 Tutsi women were raped.

The term “genocide” was cemented into the global consciousness with the Rwandan massacre. Coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-Jewish lawyer, “genocide” combines the Greek word genos (meaning race or tribe) with the Latin word cide (killing) to describe the systematic and deliberate extermination of a group, as seen during the Holocaust. The term became crucial in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

Many governments and organizations initially downplayed the scale of the violence in 1994. By the time the genocide was widely acknowledged, most of the killing had already occurred. In hindsight, this is seen as a major moral and political failure, which has tested the social structure of that country.

In the 30 years since, the country has under President Paul Kagame  done surprisingly well. After a decade of recovery, the country entered a phase of high economic growth. For an extended period, it became one of the fastest-growing economies in Africa, while reducing poverty and fertility rates. Today Rwanda is an inspiration for other poor and struggling countries and a modern-day example of the biblical truth that adversity and trials will develop perseverance, which leads to new constructive solutions.

Rwandan prisoners are shown attending a lecture on restorative justice principles. (Contributed photo)

However, the racial divide which initially led to the conflict has been a lingering background concern, and consequently much effort has been extended on healing, forgiveness and integration issues throughout the community and in the prison system to which the main perpetrators were incarcerated.

After the genocide, Rwanda faced an overwhelming challenge of how to deliver justice for the vast number of people involved in the genocide. The conventional justice system was crippled, with courts destroyed, and many judges, lawyers, and other judicial personnel either killed or implicated in the genocide.

A fascinating part of the solution was the reintroduction of the Gacaca courts, which were the ruling community-based justice system in Rwanda before colonial powers took over the country. This traditional court system was revived and adapted in the aftermath of the 1994 genocide. The term “Gacaca” (pronounced ga-cha-cha) comes from the Rwandan word for “grass,” referring to the informal gatherings where community elders would traditionally resolve disputes while sitting on the grass.

Pius Nyakayiro, director of the Good News Rwanda organization, speaks to the female population of the Nyamagabe women’s prison. (Contributed photo)

The Gacaca courts tried over 1.2 million cases between 2001 and their official closure in 2012 and played a crucial role in dealing with the massive backlog of genocide-related cases the conventional justice system could not handle. However, the Gacaca courts were not without controversy. Critics pointed to several issues, including lack of legal expertise, intimidation, false testimony, and inadequate appeal process.

Despite these criticisms, many Rwandan and international observers view the Gacaca courts as a significant mechanism for achieving justice and promoting reconciliation in the aftermath of the genocide.

Today the 13 prisons now in operation in Rwanda hold more than 80,000 male and 5,000 female prisoners, many of whom are serving long sentences for their part in the systematic killings.

Over the years, the Rwandan government has improved prison facilities and made law revisions regarding prison overcrowding. Soon a halfway house will be operational so released prisoners gradually can prepare for home return and, in the meantime, can communicate with family members through phone conversations.

Nyakayiro and his staff at Good News Rwanda are hopeful that with all these efforts for the safe reintegration the prisoners will eventually be accomplished. However, he fervently appeals to the international prison outreach community and faith organizations for assistance. “We would like to introduce professional Restorative Justice concepts and proven programs like Adopt-A-Prison, Rehabilitation through the Arts, Unlocking Harmony, and others to help our imprisoned brothers and sister return home with peace,” Nyakayiro said.

May the world not be silent to the Rwanda call again.

The Rev. Dr. Hans Hallundbaek, a minister in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), is a co-founder of both Rehabilitation through the Arts and the Interfaith Prison Partnership, an outreach of Hudson River Presbytery. He is an adjunct instructor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Marist College. He lives in Katonah, New York.

Today’s Focus: Hard healing work in Rwanda

Let us join in prayer for:

PC(USA) Agencies’ Staff
Joel Townsend, IT Help Desk Specialist, Administrative Services Group (A Corp) 
Cuong Tran, Mail/Print Clerk, Mail/Print Center, Administrative Services Group (A Corp) 

Let us pray

Creator God, guide us to recognize your love for all people. We rejoice that you have given us individuality while holding us all in your hand. Help us learn from each other and acknowledge the strength that is gained through diversity. Amen.


Creative_Commons-BYNCNDYou may freely reuse and distribute this article in its entirety for non-commercial purposes in any medium. Please include author attribution, photography credits, and a link to the original article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeratives 4.0 International License.